Open models keep AI continually available, rather than dependent on any one provider's decisions.

13 source(s) assert this claim, 1 deny it.

Who asserts it

They they had to make it available for people and uh it's their job to make the technology harden and safe and secure uh and whatever whatever uh whatever jailbreaks or whatever vulnerabilities there are in the software as soon as they find it they ought to fix it. That's the nature of software. And um uh look look what happened. Uh it was released. Um somehow it was uh uh jailbreed and uh it was able to do things that that u maybe they were trying to guard rail it for not to do. Um but everything was fine.

Jensen Huang: 'AI Doomers Have It Wrong' — Axios Interview Full Transcript — 2026-07-23

It's best for cyber security and so depending on irrespective of how many industries uh open models is foundational to the advance of science and the advancement of computer science today. Uh I really do hope that we keep it open. >> Simple question on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. Should American companies be allowed to use Chinese AI models? Absolutely. Absolutely. I there's a there's a misconception that somehow uh there are back doors that is somehow connected to to China in some way. You download the models. You could uh you could fine-tune it. You can uh enhance it.

Jensen Huang: 'AI Doomers Have It Wrong' — Axios Interview Full Transcript — 2026-07-23

The United States now faces a similar choice with artificial intelligence. **Our AI leadership will be judged not by one frontier AI model, but by whether the United States builds a strong, open ecosystem that diffuses into every sector.** This is essential for creating opportunities for innovation and prosperity across the country. It requires expanding access to AI, encouraging competition, robust application layers, and giving Americans greater control over the technology they rely on.

Open Weights and American AI Leadership — 2026-07-24

Who denies it

Overall my view is that AI is *structurally* a technology that tends to concentrate power, for reasons that have nothing to do with regulation (more to do with the extreme implications of the scaling laws). Open-weights do help some with this but are nowhere near a sufficient solution because they simply shift the concentration somewhat to those with the most compute and chips (which are roughly the frontier labs plus maybe hardware providers).

Regulation and Messaging — Dario Amodei's X Reply to Gavin Baker — 2026-08-15

Every quotation on this page was fetched from the archive when the page was built. A quotation the archive cannot supply fails the build, so nothing here is paraphrased and no source is quoted beyond what it actually wrote.